آمایش و توسعه نواحی ساحلی و مرزی

آمایش و توسعه نواحی ساحلی و مرزی

نقش سرمایه اجتماعی بر حفاظت مراتع: یک تحلیل کتاب‌شناختی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
زهرا محمدی
ذبیح الله ترابی
گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
10.22034/jpd.2024.711897
چکیده
مراتع از جمله منابع طبیعی و به‌عنوان ذخایر ژنتیکی جانوری و گیاهی مهم هستند، اما تحت تأثیر تخریب ناشی از عوامل طبیعی و انسانی قرارگرفته‌اند. مدیریت و حفاظت از مراتع باید در پاسخ به عدم قطعیت‌ها و تغییرات انعطاف‌پذیر و سازگار باشد. پژوهشگران معتقدند که سطوح سرمایه اجتماعی بر رفتارهای زیست‌محیطی و حفاظت از محیط‌زیست تأثیر به‌سزایی دارد و رفتارهای زیست‌محیطی افراد و تمایل آن‌ها به حفظ محیط‌زیست به شخصیت، وضعیت و ظرفیت‌های اجتماعی در جامعه بستگی دارد. تحقیق از نوع هستی‌شناسی ایده الیسم و معرفت‌شناسی کمی‌گرا و روش‌شناسی کمی و روش تحقیق علم‌سنجی استفاده‌شده است مقاله به مطالعه موضوعی نقش سرمایه اجتماعی برای حفاظت مراتع با بهره‌گیری از رویکرد کمی- علم‌سنجی، روش تحلیل محتوا و فن بررسی نظام‌مند و هم رخدادی واژگان کلیدی، به بررسی منابع پایگاه‌های اسکوپوس، با استفاده از نرم‌افزار VOSviewer پرداخته شد. هدف پژوهش ارزیابی تولیدات علمی در زمینه نقش سرمایه اجتماعی در حفاظت مراتع است. نتایج حاصل از تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که بین سال‌های 2022-2024 در مورد نقش سرمایه اجتماعی برای حفاظت مراتع انجام‌شده که بیشترین تحقیقات در کشور امریکا و استرالیا و ایتالیا، چین و ایران بوده است. در بین نویسندگان هم محققین حسین آزادی و مسلم سواری و گینز بیشترین عملکرد رو داشته‌اند. بیشترین تحقیقات در مجلات محیط‌زیست و بعدازآن در علوم اجتماعی به چاپ رسیده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
سرمایه اجتماعی
محیط زیست
حفاظت از مراتع
کتابشناسی

عنوان مقاله English

The Role of social capital on rangeland conservation: a bibliometric analysis

نویسندگان English

Zahra Mohammadi
Zabih-allah Torabi
Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Pastures are among natural resources and are important as animal and plant genetic reserves, but they have been affected by destruction caused by natural and human factors. The management and protection of pastures should be flexible and adaptable in response to uncertainties and changes. Researchers believe that the levels of social capital have a significant impact on environmental behaviors and environmental protection, and people's environmental behaviors and their desire to preserve the environment depend on their personality, status, and social capacities in society. Ontology of idealism and subjective epistemology qualitative methodology and scientometric qualitative research method have been used. The article is a thematic study of the role of social capital in protecting pastures using a qualitative-scientometric approach, content analysis method, and technique. Systematic and incidental analysis of key words was done by checking the sources of Scopus databases using the software (VOS Wirer). The aim of the research is to evaluate scientific productions in the field of the role of social capital in the protection of pastures. The results of the research show that between the years 2022-2024, the role of social capital for the protection of pastures has been carried out, and the most researches have been conducted in America, Australia, Italy, China and Iran. Among the authors, the researchers Hossein Azadi, Moslem Savari and Gaines have performed the most. Most of the researches have been published in environmental journals and then in social sciences.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Social capital
Environment
Rangeland protection
Bibliography
  1. Abdulahi, M. M., Mohammadi, Z., & Alijani, B. (2016). Rangeland degradation: Extent, impacts, and alternative restoration techniques. Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, 5(2), 1-15.
  2. Abolhassani, L., Azadi, H., & Witlox, F. (2013). Attitudes of rangeland holders towards sustainable range management in Iran: A case study of the Semnan rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 35(4), 435–443.
  3. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self‐efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683.
  4. Al-Bukhari, A., Röder, A., Hill, J., & Briem, E. (2018). A review of potential methods for monitoring rangeland degradation in Libya. Pastoralism, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13570-018-0117-5
  5. Atanga, N. L., Treydte, A. C., & Birner, R. (2013). Assessing the sustainability of different small-scale livestock production systems in the Afar Region, Ethiopia. Land, 2(4), 726–755.
  6. Atshan, S., Keshavarzi, A., & Zare, M. (2020). Pathways to urban sustainability through individual behaviors: The role of social capital. Environmental Science & Policy, 112, 330–339.
  7. Auer, A., von Below, J., Nahuelhual, L., Mastrangelo, M., Gonzalez, A., Gluch, M., ... & Paruelo, J. (2020). The role of social capital and collective actions in natural capital conservation and management. Environmental Science & Policy, 107, 168–178.
  8. Azarm, H., Ghorbani, M., & Salahi-Moghaddam, A. (2022). Incorporating land use changes and pastoralists’ behavior in sustainable rangeland management: Evidence from Iran. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 80, 48–60.
  9. Baldi, G., & Paruelo, J. M. (2008). Land-use and land cover dynamics in South American temperate grasslands. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 6.
  10. Bansha Dulal, H., & Foa, R. (2011). Social institutions as a form of intangible capital. The World Bank.
  11. Barnes-Mauthe, M., Arita, S., Allen, S. D., Gray, S. A., & Leung, P. (2015). Social capital as an ecosystem service: Evidence from a locally managed marine area. Ecosystem Services, 16, 283–293.
  12. Bassuk, S. S., Glass, T. A., & Berkman, L. F. (1999). Social disengagement and incident cognitive decline in community-dwelling elderly persons. Annals of Internal Medicine, 131(3), 165–173.
  13. Basupi, L. V., Quinn, C. H., & Dougill, A. J. (2019). Adaptation strategies to environmental and policy change in semi-arid pastoral landscapes: Evidence from Ngamiland, Botswana. Journal of Arid Environments, 166, 17–27.
  14. Bolo, P. O., Kinyua, M., & Kihara, J. (2019). Rangeland degradation: Causes, consequences, monitoring techniques and remedies. CIAT Publication No. 520. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT).
  15. Brandt, M., Romankiewicz, C., Spiekermann, R., & Samimi, C. (2014). Environmental change in time series–An interdisciplinary study in the Sahel of Mali and Senegal. Journal of Arid Environments, 105, 52–63.
  16. Brennan, D. S., & Spencer, A. J. (2003). Restorative service patterns in Australia: Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer restorations. International Dental Journal, 53(6), 455–463.
  17. Briske, D. D. (Ed.). (2017). Rangeland systems: Processes, management and challenges. Springer.
  18. Briske, D. D., Joyce, L. A., Polley, H. W., Brown, J. R., Wolter, K., Morgan, J. A., ... & Bailey, D. W. (2015). Climate‐change adaptation on rangelands: Linking regional exposure with diverse adaptive capacity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 13(5), 249–256.
  19. Brooks, S. K., Dunn, R., Amlôt, R., Rubin, G. J., & Greenberg, N. (2016). Social and occupational factors associated with psychological distress and disorder among disaster responders: A systematic review. BMC Psychology, 4(1), 18.
  20. Castillo, G. M. L., Engler, A., & Wollni, M. (2021). Planned behavior and social capital: Understanding farmers’ behavior toward pressurized irrigation technologies. Agricultural Water Management, 243, 106524.
  21. Cevher, C. (2023). Socioeconomic factors affecting sustainable management of improved rangelands in Kayseri, Turkey. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 87, 44–54.
  22. Chan, L., & Bishop, B. (2013). A moral basis for recycling: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 96–102.
  23. Danish, S., Zafar-ul-Hye, M., Mohsin, F., & Hussain, M. (2019). Alleviation of chromium toxicity in maize by Fe fortification and chromium tolerant ACC deaminase producing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 185, 109706.
  24. Den Herder, M., Moreno, G., Mosquera-Losada, R. M., Palma, J. H., Sidiropoulou, A., Freijanes, J. J., ... & Burgess, P. J. (2017). Current extent and stratification of agroforestry in the European Union. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 241, 121–132.
  25. Eftekhari, A., & Khaliphazadeh, R. (2018). The importance of rangelands in environmental aspects, water production and proper management method. The 7th National Conference on Pasture and Pasture Management of Iran. [Conference proceeding, in Persian].
  26. Eratboni, F., Ghorbani, M., Azarnivand, H., & Mehrabi, A. A. (2019). Investigation of factors influencing participation of ranchers in range management plans (case study: Savadkooh Watershed, Mazandaran). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 26(2), 334-348. [In Persian with English abstract].
  27. Fachrudin, K. A., Fachrudin, H. T., & Utami, W. (2022). The role of financial behavior in mediating the influence of socioeconomic characteristics and neurotic personality traits on financial satisfaction. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2080152.
  28. Fatemi, M., Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., & Karimi, S. (2018). Sustainability of environmental management in Iran: An ecological footprint analysis. Iran Agricultural Research, 37(2), 53–68.
  29. Fetchenhauer, D., & Van der Vegt, G. (2001). Honesty, trust and economic growth. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 32(3), 189–200.
  30. Fetoui, M., Frija, A., Sghaier, M., & Dhehibi, B. (2021). Prospects for stakeholder cooperation in effective implementation of enhanced rangeland restoration techniques in southern Tunisia. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 74, 9–20.
  31. Gai, H., Zhang, J., & Li, W. (2019). Research on farmers’ conservation tillage technology adoption behavior from the perspective of social embeddedness: Based on the survey data of 668 farmers in Hebei, Anhui and Hubei Provinces. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 28, 2141–2153. [In Chinese].
  32. Gao, Y., Zhang, X., Lu, J., Wu, L., & Yin, S. (2020). Influence of a new agricultural technology extension mode on farmers' technology adoption behavior in China. Journal of Rural Studies, 76, 173–183.
  33. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
  34. Grumbine, R. E. (1994). Wildness, wise use, and sustainable development. Environmental Ethics, 16(3), 227–249.
  35. Guodong, Y., & Jiancheng, K. (2009). Investigation on public environmental awareness in Shanghai. In 2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology (Vol. 3, pp. 571-574). IEEE.
  36. Haji, L., Ghorbani, M., Azadi, H., & Tan, R. (2023). Toward co-management of Iran's rangelands: Combining stakeholder analysis and social networks analysis. Global Ecology and Conservation, 46, e02572.
  37. Hankerson, B. R., Kölzsch, A., van Bodegom, P. M., Usui, T., & Nolet, B. A. (2019). Modeling the spatial distribution of grazing intensity in Kazakhstan. PLoS ONE, 14(1), e0210051.
  38. He, P., Zhang, J., & Li, W. (2019). Cognitive social capital and farmers’ participation behavior in environmental governance—An example of straw resource utilization approach. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 40, 187–194. [In Chinese].
  39. Holechek, J. L. (2013). Global trends in population, energy use and climate: Implications for policy development, rangeland management and rangeland users. The Rangeland Journal, 35(2), 117–129.
  40. Hong, K.-S. (2002). Relationships between students' and instructional variables with satisfaction and learning from a Web-based course. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 267–281.
  41. Huang, J., Zhang, G., Zhang, Y., Guan, X., Wei, Y., & Guo, R. (2020). Global desertification vulnerability to climate change and human activities. Land Degradation & Development, 31(11), 1380–1391.
  42. Hussein, A. (2021). Courses of rangeland degradation and rehabilitation techniques in the rangelands of Ethiopia. Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change, 12(582), 2.
  43. International Reference Centre for Community Water Supply and Sanitation (IRC). (1981). Community participation in water and sanitation: Concepts, strategies and methods.
  44. Jawuoro, S., Koech, O., & Karuku, G. (2017). Impact of water governance regimes on forage characteristics and soil properties in Kajiado County, Kenya. Ecological Processes, 6(1), 23.
  45. Jones, N. (2010). Environmental activation of citizens in the context of policy agenda formation and the influence of social capital. The Social Science Journal, 47(1), 121–136.
  46. Kant, S., & Vertinsky, I. (2022). The anatomy of social capital of a Canadian indigenous community: Implications of social trust field experiments for community-based forest management. Forest Policy and Economics, 144, 102822.
  47. Kelly, D. (2001). Community participation in rangeland management. RIRDC Publication No. 01/143. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.
  48. Klimova, A., Rondeau, E., Andersson, K., Porras, J., Rybin, A., & Zaslavsky, A. (2016). An international Master's program in green ICT as a contribution to sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 223–239.
  49. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.
  50. Knapp, C. N., & Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. (2009). Knowledge in practice: Documenting rancher local knowledge in northwest Colorado. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 62(6), 500–509.
  51. Lehtonen, M. (2004). The environmental–social interface of sustainable development: Capabilities, social capital, institutions. Ecological Economics, 49(2), 199–214.
  52. Li, D., Zhao, L., Ma, S., Shao, S., & Zhang, L. (2019). What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 28–34.
  53. Lienert, J., Schnetzer, F., & Ingold, K. (2013). Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. Journal of Environmental Management, 125, 134–148.
  54. Liu, J., Qu, H., Huang, D., Chen, G., Yue, X., Zhao, X., & Liang, Z. (2014). The role of social capital in encouraging residents' pro-environmental behaviors in community-based ecotourism. Tourism Management, 41, 190–201.
  55. Lund, H. G. (2007). Accounting for the world's rangelands. Rangelands, 29(1), 3–10.
  56. Ma, Z., Guo, S., Deng, X., & Xu, D. (2022). Place attachment, community trust, and farmer's community participation: Evidence from the hardest-hit areas of Sichuan, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 73, 102892.
  57. Mack, G., Kohler, A., Heitkämper, K., & El-Benni, N. (2008). Entwicklung der Alpung in der Schweiz: Ökonomische Bedeutung und ökologische Auswirkungen [Development of alpine pasturing in Switzerland: Economic importance and ecological impacts]. Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture, 1(1), 259–300. [In German].
  58. McNeal Jr, R. B. (1999). Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Social Forces, 78(1), 117–144.
  59. Ming-can, L., Zhi-jun, Y., & Jin-long, L. (2000). Strategies on natural forest protection of collective forest area in minority nationality community in China: A case of the forest resource management in datu village. Journal of Forestry Research, 11(2), 132-134.
  60. Nasry, M., Fami, H. S., & Ghasemi, J. (2017). An analysis of the impact of socio-economic variables upon local communities’ participation in rangeland protection (Case study: Gomorgan Village-Malard County). Ecopersia, 5(3), 1829–1836.
  61. Ohta, R., Ryu, Y., & Katsube, T. (2020). Rural physicians' perceptions about the challenges of participating in interprofessional collaboration: Insights from a focus group study. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 20, 100345.
  62. Ostrom, E. (2010). Analyzing collective action. Agricultural Economics, 41(s1), 155–166.
  63. Paldam, M. (2000). Social capital: One or many? Definition and measurement. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14(5), 629–653.
  64. Pearson, A. W., Carr, J. C., & Shaw, J. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 949–969.
  65. Prager, K., Reed, M., & Scott, A. (2015). How should rural policy be evaluated if it aims to foster community involvement in environmental management? Journal of Rural Studies, 37, 120–131.
  66. Prestele, R., Alexander, P., Rounsevell, M. D., Arneth, A., Calvin, K., Doelman, J., ... & Verburg, P. H. (2016). Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: A global‐scale model comparison. Global Change Biology, 22(12), 3967–3983.
  67. Proferes, N., Jones, N., Gilbert, S., Fiesler, C., & Zimmer, M. (2021). Studying reddit: A systematic overview of disciplines, approaches, methods, and ethics. Social Media + Society, 7(2), 20563051211019004.
  68. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1992). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
  69. Raj, A., & Sharma, L. K. (2023). Spatial E-PSR modelling for ecological sensitivity assessment for arid rangeland resilience and management. Ecological Modelling, 478, 110283.
  70. Ren, Z., Fu, Z., & Liu, X. (2022). The influence of social capital on farmers’ green control technology adoption behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1001442.
  71. Rigi, M., Barani, H., Abedi Sarvestani, A., & Shahraki, M. R. (2019). An investigation for identifying drivers, uncertainties, and strategies on livelihood in range dependents rural communities (case study: Iran's Sistan and Baluchestan turanian pastures). Geography and Development, 17(56), 91-118. [In Persian].
  72. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., ... & Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475.
  73. Ruiz, X. F. Q., Jitmun, T., & Kitchaicharoen, J. (2020). Collective action milieus and governance structures of protected geographical indications for coffee in Colombia, Thailand and Indonesia. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1).
  74. Rupasingha, A., Goetz, S. J., & Freshwater, D. (2006). The production of social capital in US counties. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(1), 83–101.
  75. Sabour, F., Chizari, M., & Pezeshki-Rad, G. (2014). Social capital status among member and non-member farmers of agricultural associations in Garmsar Township. Co-Operation and Agriculture, 3(11), 95-118. [In Persian].
  76. Salari, F., Ghorbani, M., & Kohansal, M. R. (2015). Social monitoring in local stakeholders network to water resources local governance (Case study: Razin watershed, Kermanshah City). Journal of Range and Watershed Managment, 68(2), 287-305. [In Persian with English abstract].
  77. Savari, M., & Gharechaee, H. (2020). Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to predict Iranian farmers’ intention for safe use of chemical fertilizers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121512.
  78. Sayre, N. F., McAllister, R. R., Bestelmeyer, B. T., Moritz, M., & Turner, M. D. (2013). Social and legal effects on monitoring and adaptive management: A case study of national forest grazing allotments, 1927–2007. Society & Natural Resources, 26(1), 86–94.
  79. Schuller, T. (2001). The complementary roles of human and social capital. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 18–24.
  80. Shukla, P. R., Skea, J., Calvo Buendia, E., Masson-Delmotte, V., Pörtner, H. O., Roberts, D. C., ... & Malley, J. (Eds.). (2019). Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. IPCC.
  81. Souchère, V., Millair, L., Echeverria, J., Bousquet, F., Le Page, C., & Etienne, M. (2010). Co-constructing with stakeholders a role-playing game to initiate collective management of erosive runoff risks at the watershed scale. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1359–1370.
  82. Stern, M. J., & Baird, T. D. (2015). Trust ecology and the resilience of natural resource management institutions. Ecology and Society, 20(2), 14.
  83. Story, W. T., Taleb, F., Ahasan, S. M., & Ali, N. A. (2020). Social capital and disaster preparedness in Oromia, Ethiopia: An evaluation of the “Women Empowered” approach. Social Science & Medicine, 257, 111907.
  84. Sullivan, J. L., & Transue, J. E. (1999). The psychological underpinnings of democracy: A selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 625–650.

  • تاریخ دریافت 24 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 20 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 16 فروردین 1404